4 Years Ago

In Switzerland last week, UBS told its clients that if they deposited more than €500,000 with them they would be charged 0.6% p.a. for the privilege of UBS looking after their money.

Meanwhile in Denmark, where bond markets date back to 1787, with Jyske Bank, the country’s third-largest bank, one can get a loan for 10 years, paying no interest, and repaying only 99.5% of the loan i.e. paying back less than was initially borrowed (excluding any administration costs). Therefore, it is of little surprise that recently Danish house prices reached their highest level, beating an 11-year record.

However, are stock markets trying to tell us something as, from the beginning of 2018, the total market value of banks across the globe has fallen 20%? The problem is particularly acute in Europe (which did not get the support that US banks enjoyed) as the European banks did not restructure themselves as aggressively as the US banks did following the 2008 banking crisis. In Germany, Deutsche Bank and Commerzbank estimate that negative interest rates are costing them €2.4-billion ($3.49-billion) a year (about a third of the total cost to the Eurozone banks.) After all, what will central banks and governments be able to do in the event of the next financial shock as they cannot cut interest rates very much? 
The situation does not look like it is going to change any time soon with Nordea, Scandinavia's biggest bank, stating it would offer a 20-year fixed-rate mortgage with 0% interest. Bergmann, the chief analyst at Nordea's home finance unit, recently said, “It's an uncomfortable thought that there are investors who are willing to lend money for 30 years and get just 0.5% in return. It shows how scared investors are of the current situation in the financial markets, and that they expect it to take a very long time before things improve."

Current yields on 10-year sovereign bonds.








Source: The Globe and Mail (as at 6th September 2019)
If more information about the banks’ balance sheets and liabilities was held in a more ‘structured/digital’ manner using blockchain technology, it ought to be easier for regulators to carry out risk analysis and sensitivity testing of potential systemic risks. Currently, it is very difficult and time consuming to calculate the potential impact on, say, Barclays in the UK, if UniCredit (in Italy) were to have its credit rating downgraded. Smart Contracts run over Blockchain-powered platforms can be used to build in programmable compliance and regulatory controls, and thus replace many of the current analogue paper-based systems.
Quantitative easing, which started initially in Japan in 2001, and the numerous interest rate reductions have both also assisted to drive down the cost of borrowing (pumping $ trillions into the global economy), yet still, economic growth has remained anaemic. Therefore, this is fuelling more doubt on the conventional wisdom that low-interest rates are the answer to stimulate economic growth. If anything, it would seem that it has led to even greater inequality of wealth. In the UK, according to the Guardian, “The least wealthy 10% of households saw their real wealth rise by £3,000 between 2006-08 and 2012-14, versus £350,000 in gains for the wealthiest 10%”.
An unintended consequence of low, let alone, negative...


#FrontierInsights
#Bonds
#BondMarket
30% of the global, tradeable bond universe is being sold - with a guaranteed loss attached to the coupon. That’s an eye-watering $US16.7 trillion”

One wonders, why some cryptocurrencies are not significantly higher than they are? There are further factors to consider:



At some stage, these debts need to be dealt with. But how?

 

  • Default on the debt
  • Pay off the debt
  • Inflation to reduce the real impact of the debt mountain

 

To pay off the global debt by economic growth seems like a tall order to say the least, given the historic track record of the global economy in racking up debts. This leaves us with default or inflation, both of which could lead to a world recession, massive asset price volatility and, more wrongly, a huge loss in confidence. However, would this backdrop of economic chaos pave the way for a new financial order (which is less reliant on the reckless spending of governments) and quantitive easing, which has driven interest rates to almost ZERO, so fuelling this debt bonanza?

 

In such a crisis will we see Blockchain-powered Digital Currency backed by real assets emerge (not just other fiat currencies), which cannot be manipulated by governments and politicians, and with which the populous can both transact with and trust?


#FrontierInsights
#Yielding
#Bonds
The World Bank has for the second time in a year used Blockchain technology to issue a bond raising $33m taking the total amount raised using this method to over $100 million so far.

Last year the World Bank in conjunction with Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CA), Royal Bank of Canada and TD Securities raised $80 million.

Sophie Gilder, Head of Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence at CBA, was reported as saying: “CBA now has tangible evidence that blockchain technology can deliver a new level of efficiency, transparency, and risk management capability versus the existing market infrastructure. Next, we intend to deliver additional functionality to deliver greater efficiencies in settlement, custody and regulatory compliance.

 The World Bank issues $50 billion to $60 billion p.a. so if we assume that it costs 0.5% to issue a bond and if the expenses to issue a bond can be reduced by just 20%  this would equate to the World Bank potentially saving $5 to $6 million a year.

The total value of bonds just in the USA is $40 trillion and if you assumed that just 10% i.e. $4 trillion a year matures and gets re-issued and the one can save  20% of the 0.5% cost this equates to an annual potential saving just in the USA of $400 million a year.

According to Thompson Reuters in 2018, there was over $6.6 trillion of debt issued globally in 2018 and 25 banks accounted for 55% of the issuance.

Little wonder why there is more and more interest in using Blockchain technology to cut out layers of costs and intermediaries not to mention the greater transparency and risk controls that can be implemented.

 

#FrontierInsights
#Bonds
#BlockchainTechnology

The total value of negative-yielding bonds has almost tripled since October 2018, with countries such as Switzerland, Sweden, Germany, France, the Netherlands and Japan leading the way in issuing such bonds.

 



Former Federal Reserve (Fed) Chairman, Alan Greenspan, recently reported to Bloomberg “nothing is stopping the U.S. from getting sucked into the global trend of negative-yielding debt. There is no barrier for U.S. Treasury yields going below zero. Zero has no meaning, besides being a certain level”. Only retiring in 2006, Greenspan was Chairman of the Fed during the 1987 crash and was in charge in the years of the debt-fuelled and derivative madness which led up to the 2008 banking crisis – he hardly has an unblemished track record.

There are more than $15 trillion bonds (see the chart below) that pay minus interest rates. Investors have to pay for the privilege of buying these bonds, as opposed to being paid to hold them.

 

Source: Deutsch Bank

 

One of the central bank’s main tools become ineffective when interest rates are very low. Savers potentially start to look for other ways to store and hold their money -maybe people just store cash under their beds. This would be a huge challenge as there is just not enough physical banknotes if savers asked for their bank deposits to be converted into banknotes. No single country has enough banknotes to enable everyone to hold cash if they wanted to.

The IMF recently wrote a report - Monetary Policy with Negative Interest Rates: Decoupling cash from Electronic Money, stating “The existence of cash prevents central banks from cutting interest rates much below zero. In this paper, we consider the practical feasibility of recent proposals for decoupling cash from electronic money to achieve a negative yield on cash which would remove the lower bound constraint on monetary policy”.

But could money in a different form i.e. Digital Currency, offer a new range of tools for governments to regain control? Maybe this is why Martin Chavez, Global co-head of securities at Goldman Sachs, recently said “I am highly confident that the Federal Reserve will one day digitize the U.S. dollar. And it will be a cryptocurrency that is the Federal Reserve issued fiat US dollar”.


#FrontierInsights
#Bonds
#InterestRates